bobby and jack both emphasized: 'putt when you can'. namely, putt is much easier. and if and only if putt is easy, then putt is not swing. it's high time they be apart...
since i last stated, there have been two main streams for golf whole swing: one is 'counter-fall perpensia' and the other is 'slingpult'; both are fine. yet when putting and chipping being concerned, i'd take the former as a hallmark for consistancy and simplicity.
how? imagine a longitudinal section vertical to the ground dividing the torso apart, which meet the vertabrae at about t5, above which the entire upper-mass swing is perpendicularly to the green, and below which the lower-mass stativ is just as stable and rigid as a motar stand, so similar to the main idea pertaining to a upright-style swing.
it is pitiful to admit that two measures though be taken with view to whole swing and putt'n chips (approaching still snugs in catapult), the two hitting system totally different after all, yet the different muscle groups should reasonably be 'awakened' by different stimuli, in light of better efficacy and more expectable output rather than intitutionalizing them within a senseless rigid frame. well as said above, the two hitting system are totally different. how can it be necessary and feasible when we put siblings into twins since both are stemmed from the same parents and one out of the question resembles the other?
請先 登入 以發表留言。