now i found him, the fourth superman, and his name is nothing but an old water bottle. that reminds me of a reproach from one of my golf mentors, an-kuo. he told me to release my trail arm force right in the beginning of the down swing, which makes much sense with view to solid impact and powerful follow through. and that also makes what ben hogan once exclaimed that how he wished to have had three right hands so meaningful, right a dead aim toward power and consistency.

confusingly, the question is: i've long found that clutch move, yet to hit effortlessly and consistently, not to mention the yardage and pose. why? the reasons are as followed:

1. i let loose the sequence, which is a nice and smooth linkage of pelvis, torso, hands, legs, torso, and back to hands. i just boldly skipped from p to t and directly stumbled into hands, only to find un sospiro in my coming golf days... 

2. i didn't get the 'real meaning' of ben's 'three-right-hand theory'. i mistook it for the power of three hands while the true answer for it lies not necessarily in the 'power' they apply, rather in the 'masses' clinged to as a whole. you may ask why three, why not ten or dozens. well, cuz, in the light of reasonable output an average pro could make in the course, the lower body exertion can at best be nine, which is barely for the upper three.

so, a reliable version of my new swing adjustment, 99f1.4.1, aka the amazing four, will be like this:

 o-  .-  \.* 

now i can be bit happy with my swing and get quite a nice feeling performing it... :) 

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    repentor 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()