關於愛，我是個小學生。

試申論下列主張之哲學思維：

"我承認自己能力不強，也沒有刻意低眼看人，但我相信我和他理解到的東西不一樣。"  

答：

I say SHOEI is the best helmet in the world!

But Rossi and Biaggi do not agree with me. 

They are the best bike racers in the world.

I am an ass hole in the ring.

Which one do you believe?


Honestly to say, there would be totally different views on a single event, and there would be nothing good and bad --- if there were not a criterion in mind to tell them. We judge things by the criterions we conceived, which may be acquired in our childhood, through subconsciousness, even late when adolescence, or still later when we are old. These standards of our values stand for our thinking and preference. Most times they stand relatively for our cognition to the whole world, that is, our beliefs toward the sensational receptions.  

Strangely to say, why are people mostly so sure and self-confident to claim their faith to something to be true and thus they feel so cozy in their own grooves they created for themselves without examining their motivations and the logical inductiveness of the faith itself? They don't even check, or, let me put it this way, reconsider other aspects from others before they decisively "found out" the "truth". Is it the real truth or is it just the information that would less rub against their disobedient mane? The reasons may be as followed:  

First, people don’t have much time to ponder such stuffs. They are quite occupied by the routines of chores they daily meet to feed themselves from being starved. To survive is the very first thing human behave instinctively. Many people have problems making the both ends meet. Obviously they will not in such mood to immerge themselves into the seemingly “breadless” issues.  

Second, people are hasty, too hasty to stay for a while at a point of view, or at a pinch of thinking, which may sometimes the essential sparkle of life, the key to the universe. They dig in it and throw it up, without even chewing and tasting it, and they want to tell others that it’s nothing but a ripe Apple. They may never to bite it any more for they have “well known” what it should taste like. Sometimes it is indeed a manipulation of delicacy to have them turn around to take a glance at it, not to mention having a second bite. 
 

Third, people won’t face or reveal voluntarily some experiences in their lives for they had unpleasant feelings or reviews about them in the past; sometimes these impacts caused traumas on them and the sorrows might be incurable, which were mainly the vital factors to account for their misbehaviors and abnormality reflecting to their lives in the future. Many scientists in field psychological analysis have great interest in explaining the human behaviors through this aspect, yet these methods are nowadays still remaining hypothetical. We couldn’t nor shouldn’t “judge” the consequences people did or acted out only by the limited vogue events we collected in scatter. 
 

Last but not least, instead, which is the most important, there are people that have sensitive observation and cognitive abilities as well as highly educated and dependable learning backgrounds. However, they don’t find the so called ultimate value in human lives, which may do great help to all other beings in the confusing world. They simply are not interested in this. They may rather focus more on something material. Nature-borne philosophers as they may be, sadly to say, they DARE NOT take it in their chins, having fears for revealing something they will not to confess deep in their hearts, only to follow their subjective ideologies to normally be silent ones of fellow people who are belonging to the other three categories mentioned above. They are like the rabbits in a magician’s cylinder, shyly reaching their short necks to the margin of the small hat, spying some delicious radish to make do. Are they thus pathetic? Well, to others, it is quite a pity. People once again miss a great opportunity to get close to the real answer. 
 

Whatever group we fall in (and I don’t think there is another fifth as an individual with saneness), we ought to have courage, to be brave to the questions coming naturally from our minds, and try to answer them honestly, fearlessly, and calmly. It is often too quick for us to tell things as “good” or “bad” ones. We should ask first ourselves wisely: “Is there really good-and-bads in the universe? If so, what are these, and why?” People ask about good-and-bads later, and people will ask them less; then there would be least bads and most goods, for this is the built-in incentive of human cultures. 

Before exploring and cultivating a scale to measure all deeds in the world, we survive aimlessly and meaninglessly, and we are no more than other creatures here. Since every one may have diffierent  ideas for they have diffiernt criterions upon everything, there exists nothing like "goods" and "bads", and opinions may appearantly be different.

But please trust me. Truth is still the one, never, ever though slightly, changing itself.