公告版位
這裡是我的日記本、剪貼簿、心情感想、專題探討;其中屬權管電資管理人之著作權者,皆為讀者全體所共有,歡迎複製、轉載、改作、編輯等分享與利用。

Music's Greatest Innovator by David Hurwitz, LISTEN Magazine

On the occasion of his seventy-fourth birthday in 1806, Joseph Haydn reportedly remarked: “My calling has no limits; what may yet be done in music is far greater than what has already been done.” It's a fitting comment from music's greatest innovator. Haydn was born in 1732, the son of a wheelwright living on the Austro-Hungarian border, and he died in Vienna in 1809. At the time of his death he was Europe;s most beloved composer. He had been Mozart's best friend and Beethoven's teacher. Bach and Handel were still alive when Haydn began writing music, but the Baroque period was waning. A more dynamic style based on the lively and tuneful musical language of Italian comic opera would soon characterize what we now call the Classical period, in a true musical revolution led by Haydn himself. At the end of his life Romanticism was in the air, yet Haydn was still, amazingly, at the forefront of the latest musical developments.

In his instrumental works Haydn enlarged the expressive scope of music to include not just happiness and sadness in varying degrees, but also humor, irony, desolation, ambivalence — the entire gamut of emotional expression. His “Farewell” Symphony (No. 45) remains one of the most turbulent, disturbing and ultimately wistful pieces in the form. It is the only symphony in the unusual key of F-sharp minor written in the entire eighteenth century, and the only orchestral work of note in that key written before the twentieth century. I say this not to make a tedious academic point, but to suggest that Haydn's method for expanding music's range of emotion and contrast occurred in tandem with a new approach to form, instrumental color and texture. His music isn't necessarily longer than a lot of previous Baroque music, but it's incomparably more diverse, dramatic and action-packed.

repentor 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

其實,女性主義並不全然是一種對男性霸權的反制,它只不過是一種對於 '平等' 所作另一個面向的闡述而已。只是,'性別' 這個概念,真的應該 '自始平等' 嗎?可以從以下三方面來看看:

女性主義簡介

概說該主義負面評價化的原因

repentor 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

龐大的行政體系,其運作當如何層析?高點韓台大的表列應大有助益:

行政分類:

一、法規的適用

repentor 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

證據的聲請如果對於想要查明的事實不明確,或者在使用的證據方法上難以特定,在學理上可以被定性為所謂「摸索證明」,在民事訴訟程序採行辯論主義的我國,是否應該允許摸索證明的存在?或者應該禁止?劉明生教授就此新興議題詳細介紹。

【月旦法學教室第181期】 摸索證明禁止之原則/ 劉明生 

壹、模索證明禁止原則

repentor 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

民事訴訟 422 與家事事件 31-5 皆採 '調解歸調解、訴訟歸訴訟' 的原則,為了能使當事人專注於本自由意志之真意、並期能合意共促調解之達成、不致擔心所為陳述或保證作為下次訴訟上證據或抗辯之利用。

這樣的立意是好的,為要能促使訴訟量降低、促進雙方和諧。可是這樣做亦有其缺失:想想若是這樣,有心人便可大為利用這樣的好意了,不妨乾脆在調解時先 '亂開芭樂票',以促成對方和解意願,取得與確定判決同一之效力後,事後再為債務不履行,逼使相對人提起再審之訴 (因為判決已經確定了)。雖說有判決先例認調解上所成立之私法契約,不因調解遭撤回而當然無效,可是一路這樣折騰下來,不是更麻煩、更不能伸張正義、更耗費資源、或更破壞和諧嗎?

管見認為,程序上應採 '調解裁判程序連續原則',簡單說就是,說的話要算,不能貪一時輕省之便,而有間接鼓勵雙方以虛偽、隱瞞、甚或詐欺等方式達成和解、再依訴訟法原則使系爭不再為法院所受理之治標不治本之舉措。此方為發揮 '一次性發見真實圓滿解決紛爭' 之實質意義所在。 

repentor 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Close

您尚未登入,將以訪客身份留言。亦可以上方服務帳號登入留言

請輸入暱稱 ( 最多顯示 6 個中文字元 )

請輸入標題 ( 最多顯示 9 個中文字元 )

請輸入內容 ( 最多 140 個中文字元 )

reload

請輸入左方認證碼:

看不懂,換張圖

請輸入驗證碼